Education Paul Krause Philosophy St. Thomas Aquinas

The Enchanted Cosmos with St. Thomas Aquinas ~ The Imaginative Conservative

Thomas’ cosmology and doctrine of the soul are vitalistic. All the things has a specific soul to it, and these souls have specific life-forces destined for specific ends. As an entire, the cosmos is meant to mirror and embody the graces of God, his magnificence, love, and goodness; such is to what all things are finally ordered.

St. Thomas Aquinas was described as the foundational thinker for all philosophers by Pope Pius XII. There are lots of faces to the angelic physician. He is the technical thinker of realism who baptized the most effective of Aristotle into the Catholic religion. He is the good mystic whose writings on the Ladder of Being evokes theologies of magnificence, love, and divinization. More just lately, he’s a thorough-going Neoplatonist who defended Neoplatonism with Aristotelian language.[*]

If individuals have familiarity with Thomas Aquinas it’s in all probability in affiliation with the phenomenon of Thomism. Inside the Thomist machine, the additional familiarity with Thomas is probably associated with ontological realism and that Thomas was very specific about what it means to be human and the technical specificities of Catholic theology and doctrine. This public portrait, or understanding, of Thomas is poor on many levels. It additionally distracts from his enchanted and mystical cosmos, something that—in our age of disenchantment—should be the primary recourse to the good church physician somewhat than the ontological realism that’s continuously pushed by the neo-Thomists and their followers.


“Different kinds of things produce in different ways, those on a higher level producing in a more interior way,” writes Thomas in Summa contra Gentiles (4.11). Thomas’ cosmology and doctrine of the soul are vitalistic. Every thing has a specific soul to it, and these souls have specific life-forces destined for specific ends. To untrained eyes and ears, Thomas comes off as crypto-pantheistic; as do a large number of the Church Fathers and medieval mystics and philosophers. Nevertheless, whereas pantheism sees every thing containing the same one soul fallen from the Cosmic Soul, Thomas’ cosmos is made up of “different kind[s]” of souls “produc[ing] in different ways.” Moreover, the souls of created issues have created souls with specific ends and are usually not emanated elements of the Cosmic Soul which make us depreciated instantiations of the One. By having a very crafted soul for a specific end, we are naturally poor instantiations of the One as in pantheism.

In one other part of Summa contra Gentiles (three.97-98), Thomas also writes that the range of souls “which makes things differ in species makes their behavior different too.” This variety of life “also brings with it diverse relationships to matter. . . [a]nd these diverse relationships to matter bring with them a diversity of agencies and capabilities of being acted on [by God].” It’s clear from Thomas, as it’s with traditional Christianity, that the wonderous and awe-inspiring, certainly, mystifying, understanding of the cosmos and Ladder of Being shouldn’t be the homogenous pantheism of latest age spirituality but a deeply numerous—in the truest sense—orchestra the place every thing is instantiated in its uniqueness but in addition a part of a grander undertaking. That challenge, per Thomas, is to “reflect and express [the goodness of God].”

Thomas’ Ladder of Being is directly hierarchal and concentric. Every part comes from God who created ex nihilo. Every part moves to God, who is the regulation of attraction—“That God, which ever lives and loves / One God, one law, one element, / And one far-off divine event, / To which the whole creation moves” as Tennyson poetically put it. On the bottom of the hierarchy, furthest from the middle of God, is non-living matter. Non-living matter has no soul, no anima, but continues to be important for anima, as a result of it’s in non-living matter that the lowest degree of life is rooted in: crops. “The living things closest [to matter] are plants, in which there is already some interior production, turning the inner juices of the plant into seed which, committed to earth, grows into a plant.”

Following from Greek philosophy, Thomas provides all plant genera the vegetative soul. The vegetative soul is defined by its capability to generate. Whereas the plant-soul has no awareness, and is not made within the image of God, it has a distinct soul to it; thus, Thomas’ cosmic Ladder of Being is completely vitalistic. In any case, with out vitalism there could be no variety and distinctiveness to the cosmos—something that reductionist materialism must necessarily exhaust to.

“There is another level of life above that of plants: that of animals endowed with sense awareness so that they have a form of production peculiar to themselves, starting indeed from outside but up inside, and getting more interior the further it progresses.” The animal soul stands above the vegetative soul for its sense-awareness. And inside the animal genera, as we will see from Thomas, there’s complexity to the range of animal life. Some animals are easier and additional down the animal chain than the more complicated, “more interior,” and “further progress[ed]” who’re larger on the animal ladder. In other writings Thomas further elaborates on, and classifies, the distinctions in animal life between soul-activity, the degrees of sense-awareness, motive energy, and affective and aggressive feelings.

The distinguishing characteristic of animal life, the animal soul, is sense awareness and what sense awareness aims for. The animal soul goals for enjoyment by way of the belief of affective emotion. The “capacity for affective emotion,” Thomas writes in Quaestio Disputata de Anima, “empower us to enjoy things delightful to the senses.” People do share this with animals, however this isn’t the top for humans though it’s for lower animals.

“So the highest, most perfect level of life is that of the intellect, for intellect can reflect upon itself and understand itself.” People, being made within the picture of God—who is Fact, Knowledge, and Love—subsequently possess the intellectual soul which is aimed toward understanding. Human cognitive capability to know notions, judgments, and, finally, the ethical regulation, is that which distinguishes us from the rest of creation. This distinguishing from the rest of creation is just not a separationist atomism however akin to the steps of a ladder. Humans exist as the highest step of the material world, although the ladder itself is an integrated entire. People are perfected by collaborating in Fact, Wisdom, and Love—a freedom which solely rational souls are capable of as Thomas defined in a much earlier part of Summa contra Gentiles.

But, people are most like God in that additionally they possess the tripartite soul which mirrors the Trinity. The human soul shouldn’t be merely a rational soul, nevertheless it subsumes the animal and vegetative souls as properly. Love generates. Love feels. Love understands. The Godhead generates. The Godhead feels. The Godhead understands. So it is that people generate, feel, and understand. When St. Augustine explains the consequences of sin as turning man into the beasts of the fields, it is because people reject their elementary rationality; that is, they reject what makes them human (the rational soul). Sinful people descend (fall) to stay like animals. Fallen man lives for mere sensation and bodily pleasure. However the rational soul that defines man thirsteth after the Lord and wishes to dwell within the Home of the Lord.

“God’s providence,” Thomas maintains, “orders everything to a goal—his own goodness.” The goodness and great thing about God is what the whole cosmos, and each instantiated type of life within the cosmos, aims for. Every part can also be interconnected in this Ladder of Life reaching up to God and coming from God. To mirror and embody the graces of God, his beauty, love, and goodness, is to what the whole cosmos is finally ordered, in line with Thomas.

The variety of lifeforms, each with their position to play in magnifying God’s magnificence and goodness, come together in Love, “that unitive force” which binds the whole creation together in a grand track of life. Thomas’ cosmos, his Ladder of Being, can greatest be understood like a grand waltz or symphonic orchestra where everyone in their uniqueness has an element to play. However every instantiated form of life does not exist on its own island. All the things is intertwined with each other. If a flutist or harpist performs poorly, the remainder of the efficiency suffers. If a single dancer in a dancing unit performs poorly, the rest of the efficiency suffers.


In our sterile and mechanical age Thomas’ cosmos of life is enchanted and enchanting. Indeed, it’s mystical, mysterious, and mystifying. It is cosmos that wholly and completely got here from the mouth of the God of Love. Trendy man is starved for magnificence and goodness; trendy man is starved for substance. Substance is offered in Thomas and the complete Christian imaginative and prescient—not the cliff notes version of “be kind” and disorderly consumer-oriented worship.

God’s love extends to all created issues. And all created issues are ordered to a objective. Thus, the cosmos, with man on the head, is directed towards God in a grand refrain of reward. All things really do transfer to Love, “That God, which ever lives and loves . . . To which the whole creation moves.” This Thomas is simply as much a part of the Christian tradition, and a vital part of the angelic doctor that’s typically missed. The rainbow of Thomas Aquinas is just not the empty rainbow of modernity. Actually, this aspect of Thomas is so perfectly situated to assist reenchant our lifeless world and convey it back to life, should it’s the Thomas extra individuals develop into acquainted with and discover a good friend in.

The Imaginative Conservative applies the principle of appreciation to the dialogue of tradition and politics as we strategy dialogue with magnanimity slightly than with mere civility. Will you assist us stay a refreshing oasis in the increasingly contentious area of recent discourse? Please think about donating now.

*Hankey, Wayne J. Aquinas’s Neoplatonism within the Summa Theologiae on God: A Brief Introduction. St. Augustine’s Press, 2019.

Editor’s Observe: The featured picture is “Assumption of the Virgin” (c. 1476) by Francesco Botticini (1446-1498), courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the author